当前位置： >>
世光创建周劲龙：解除双限有利于珠海楼市的发展
-& 12:11:48 来源：房掌柜 王培
[摘要]世光创建策划经理周劲龙接受房掌柜采访时表示，珠海是一个宜居的城市，在珠海置业的外地人很多，由于近期珠海解除了双限政策。这对于想来珠海置业的外地人来说是一个好消息...
　　2014年珠海(报业、ZHTV)十一房展于10月1日至10月3日分别在报业大厦和珠海电视台举行。据了解，本次房展在报业大厦有18家房企25个楼盘参展，在珠海电视台房展会场有26家房企的40个楼盘参展，参展的项目覆盖了珠海主城区、西区以及中山坦洲三乡等多个区域的楼盘，万科、雅居乐、时代、敏捷等品牌房企积极参与，其中敏捷推出了跳小苹果舞，时代地产推出了抓钱活动，春晓悦居更是带来了网络神兽羊驼，会展现场的房企们推出了各式各样的活动。
　　向来誉为楼市&晴雨表&的珠海房展会，能够给刚刚解除了双限，但依然低沉的珠海楼市注入新的变化呢?开发商将采取哪些促销策略?置业者的心态又有何变化?对此，房掌柜的采编门采访了到场的多位房企代表，为大家解析珠海楼市。
世光创建周劲龙
　　世光创建策划经理周劲龙接受房掌柜采访时表示，珠海是一个宜居的城市，在珠海置业的外地人很多，由于近期珠海解除了双限政策。这对于想来珠海置业的外地人来说是一个好消息。用于外地客户的推动，除了繁荣珠海本地的经济之外也在一定程度上推动了珠海楼市的发展，因此，在解除了双限之后，珠海的楼市有一段平稳繁荣的时期，这对于无论是购房者还是开发商来说都是一个很好的机会。
　　世光创建在珠海有东城温泉里，以及东城四季等楼盘，在地理位置上来说，这些楼盘都是出于新商圈即将形成的好地段。未来城市的规模扩大，现在所占据的位置就是先机，因此，双限的解除，对于珠海本地的购房者来说同样是一个置业的好机会。
您可以使用键盘的←和→进行翻页
阅读过本文的网友还阅读过：
责任编辑：王培
【转载声明】转载请务必注明出处和作者。
【免责声明】出于传递更多信息之目的，本网转载内容均注明出处，并不意味着赞同其观点或证实其内容的真实性。
更多精彩→&【】&【】&【】&【】&【】
房掌柜官方微信作者：&作者本人请参看导师姓名：&学位授予单位：&授予学位：硕士学位年度：2002专业：&关键词：&&&&&摘要:（摘要内容经过系统自动伪原创处理以避免复制，下载原文正常，内容请直接查看目录。）重整轨制是古代破产司法轨制的最新成长结果和主要构成部门。我国《企业破产法（试行）》没有划定重整法式，已不克不及顺应深化经济改造和昔日经济生涯的须要。跟着我国市场经济体系体例的初步确立，树立我国的破产重整轨制已成为学术界日趋存眷的话题。本文分三部门，试图依据对破产司法轨制的成长、国外重整立法的概略及我国的破产立法和相干理论做法的比拟研讨，提出树立我国破产重整轨制应确立掩护债务人好处的指点思惟，并提出应留意的立法准绳和法式规矩。第一章回想了破产法的汗青、成长，引见重整轨制的概念、内容和根本特点。经由2000多年的成长，破产法从对债务人的相对掩护，到如今统筹债权人好处和社会好处，从对人身履行轨制到对产业履行轨制，从破产有罪、难免责到破产无罪、免责，从破产惩戒主义到保存债权人需要的自在产业和破产复权轨制，这是一个对债权人愈来愈宽容，对债务人的权力逐步加以限制的进程。表现在破产司法法式上，是从单一的破产清理法式到涌现息争法式，再到以完成债权清算和解救债权企业为目的的重整法式。破产重整轨制的出生和成长，是因为跟着迷信技巧的提高，古代经济愈来愈专业化、范围化、社会化，企业日趋年夜型化，而传统的破产清理轨制、息争轨制因其固出缺陷不顺应处理有力偿债成绩的须要。重整轨制的概念学者有分歧表述，总的来讲是指在企业有力偿债的情形下，按照司法划定的法式实施债权清算，同时掩护企业持续营业并停止调剂，使之解脱窘境、完成中兴的再建型债权清算轨制。综合美、英、法、德、日等国和我国台湾地域的重整立法，重整轨制的内容有实体和法式两方面。实体内容表现在重整筹划中，由重整关系人意思自治肯定，重要包含债务债权清算和重整办法。法式内容则由司法划定，重要包含：请求法式，裁定前的预备，重整请求的裁定处置，重零件关，重整筹划的提出、表决、同意和履行，重整法式的终止和完成。重整轨制具《WP=70》有以下根本特点：1重整对象特定化，2重整缘由宽松化，3介入主体普遍化，4重整办法多样化，5法式效率优先化，6重整目的两重化，7价值取向多元化。重整轨制在债务人好处掩护上与清理轨制、息争轨制分歧，重要表现在对债务人的法式权力作出了必定的限制；但这类限制既是债务人和债权人配合好处的须要，也以对债务人的实体权力供给充足掩护为条件。第二章对我国现行破产司法轨制和企业重组的理论停止了归结和述评。我国现行破产律例范缺少迷信的系统和高程度的轨制设计，带有显著的筹划经济烙印，年夜体可分为两类：一是通俗标准，包含《企业破产法（试行）》和最高国民法院《关于贯彻履行〈企业破产法（试行）〉若干成绩的看法》，《平易近事诉讼法》第十九章“企业法人破产还债法式”和最高国民法院《关于实用〈平易近事诉讼法〉若干成绩的看法》第16节“企业法人破产还债法式”。前者实用于全平易近一切制企业，后者实用于非国有的企业法人。二是特殊标准，包含《贸易银行法》第七十一条关于贸易银行破产的特殊划定，及年国务院及国度经贸委、中国国民银行关于若干城市试行国有企业破产的标准性文件。后者制订了一套特别的法式和实体划定，并获得最高国民法院的认可。特殊标准还包含广东省、深圳经济特区的处所破产条例。现行破产律例范不只制订机关分歧，实用规模有全国、处所和若干特定城市之分，实用主体有国有企业与非国有企业之分、法人和不法人之分，其划定的破产缘由、法式和实体规矩也各不雷同。《企业破产法（试行）》划定了“息争与整理”，但整理只是为了到达息争目标而采用的手腕，而且由企业下级主管部分提出、掌管和实行，即完整由行政机关主导。这类整理不是平日意义上的重整，只是行政整理在破产法式中的运用。我国没有司法意义上的重整轨制，而经济生涯中对金融类企业、年夜型国有企业的整理、重组，证券市场年夜量吃亏上市公司五花八门的重组，都缺少应有的规制，理论中也裸露出诸多缺点和弊病。重要表示为以行政手腕取代司法法式，对债务人的法式权力和实体权力掩护不敷乃至屡有损害，而债务人没有法式保证，在权力遭到伤害后也得不到司法救援。第三章阐述了树立我国破产重整轨制的需要性，提出应表现掩护债务人好处的指点思惟，并提出响应的建议。亚洲金融危机的一个主要警示是，树立有序和有用的破产司法轨制并使之得以稳固实用，不只对掩护公正竞争和增进经济增加《WP=71》有相当主要的感化，并且有助于防备和化解金融危机。重整轨制恰是“有序和有用的”破产司法轨制应当包括的主要内容。我国现行破产司法轨制已不克不及顺应深化改造和经济成长的须要：1“三角债”情势的债权沉淀已成痼疾，困扰我国经济界多年未能铲除；2多年来作为公民经济主导力气的国有企业堕入窘境，积习难改；3证券市场已在公民经济中占领主要位置，年夜量吃亏上市公司的重组缺少司法规制。所以，树立我国的破产重整轨制已势在必行。东方破产法从最后债务人可以对有力偿债者切块分尸这类残暴的相对掩护开端，经由2000多年的成长，曾经树立严厉的社会信誉系统，老实取信已成为每个社会成员的自发行为。比较之下，影响我国市场经济次序树立和完美的障Abstract:The reorganization system is the latest development result and the main component of the ancient bankruptcy judicial system. China's "enterprise bankruptcy law (Trial)" did not delineate the restructuring process, has been unable to adapt to deepen economic transformation and the needs of the former economic life. With the initial establishment of the system of market economy in China, the establishment of the system of bankruptcy reorganization in our country has become the focus of attention of the academic circles. The third sector, trying to basis of the bankruptcy legal system of growth and foreign reforming a compendium of legislation and our country's bankruptcy legislation and coherent theory of comparative research, put forward to establish China's bankruptcy reorganization rail system should establish the guiding ideology that the benefits of the cover of the debtor, and suggested that we should leave the meaning of the principle of legislation and French rules. In the first chapter, I recall the history and development of the bankruptcy law, introduce the concept, content and basic characteristics of the reorganization system. Through the development of more than 2000 years, the bankruptcy law from the debtor relative cover, to now co-ordinate the interests of the creditors and social benefits, from the person to perform the rail system to the performance of the rail system of industrial, from bankruptcy guilty, unavoidable responsibility to the bankruptcy of innocence, exemption, from bankruptcy disciplinary doctrine to save creditors need free industry and disqualification for bankruptcy rail system. This is a of creditors is getting more and more tolerance and the debtor's power gradually be limiting processes. Performance in bankruptcy judicial procedure, is from a single bankruptcy to the emergence of the liquidation of the procedure to the French, and then to complete the creditor's right to complete the liquidation and relief for the purpose of corporate restructuring. Rail of the birth and growth of bankruptcy reorganization, because along with the improvement of science and technology, ancient economy growing more specialization, range and socialization, increasingly large enterprises, and traditional bankruptcy cleaning rail system, information system because of its inherent defects do not conform to the efficient processing of debt performance needs. Reforming rail of the concept of scholars have different expressions, generally is refers to under the enterprise effective debt situation, in accordance with the legal provisions of French debt liquidation. At the same time, the protection of corporate business and stop dispensing and liberates dilemma, ZTE reconstructive liquidation of debt rail system. Comprehensive United States, Britain, France, Germany, Japan and other countries and Taiwan region of China's restructuring legislation, the contents of the reorganization system has two aspects of the entity and the french. Entity content performance in the reorganization plan, by the reorganization of the relationship between the autonomy of the people, it is important to include debt settlement and restructuring measures. French content is the judicial delineated, including: request procedures, the preparation before the ruling, reforming requst disposal, key parts, reforming plan advance, voting, consent, and perform, reforming French closure and completion. Rail of the WP=70 "has the following basic characteristics: 1 reforming a specific object and 2 Reforming reason loose, 3 main body participation in general, 4 reforming way diversification, 5 French efficiency priority, 6 reforming objective duality. 7 the diversified value orientation reforming. Reforming rail system on the cover of the debtor's benefit and clean up the rail system, interest rate competition rail system differences and important performance in the debtor's French power
but this kind of limitation is the debtor and creditor coordination benefits needs, to the debtor of solid power supply sufficient cover conditions. In the second chapter, the theory of judicial system of bankruptcy and corporate reorganization in our country has been summarized and reviewed. China's current bankruptcy statutes lack scientific system and a high degree of rail system design, with significant brand of planned economy, the eve of the body can be divided into two categories: popular standards, including "enterprise bankruptcy law (Trial)" and the Supreme People's Court on the implementation of "enterprise bankruptcy law (Trial)" problems "," plain near civil procedure law "Chapter 19" corporate bankruptcy and debt repayment of French "and the Supreme People's court" about some achievements in practical "plain near the civil procedure law" the view "section 16 of" corporate bankruptcy and debt repayment of French ". The former is applicable to all enterprises in the whole country, and the latter is practical in the non state owned enterprise legal person. Second is a special standard, including the "commercial bank law" Article 71 about commercial bank insolvency special designated, and from 1994 to 1997 the State Council and the State Economic and Trade Commission, the people's Bank of China on several cities experimented with the bankruptcy of state-owned enterprise standard documents. The latter developed a set of special procedures and entities delineated, and the highest national court recognized. Special standard also includes Guangdong Province, Shenzhen Special Economic Zone on the premises of the bankruptcy ordinance. Current bankruptcy statutes fan not only organs develop differences, the utility scale is national, local and some specific city, the practical subject is state-owned enterprises and non state-owned enterprises, legal and non legal person, the delimitation of its bankruptcy reason, French and substantive rules also each are not identical. The enterprise bankruptcy law (Trial) "delineation of the competition and finishing, but finishing just in order to reach the goal of the wrist, and by enterprises subordinate supervisors present, rules and the implementation of, i.e., the whole is dominated by the administrative organs. This sort of arrangement is not a normal sense of reorganization, but the use of the administrative order in bankruptcy. Our country does not have the meaning of judicial reforming rail system, and the economic life of financial enterprises, large state-owned enterprise reorganization, restructuring, securities market in large quantities at the expense of reorganization of listed companies a wide variety of, the lack of a proper regulation and theory also bare目录:引言5第一章 重整制度5-29&&&&第一节 破产与破产法5-9&&&&&&&&一、 破产与破产法的概念5-6&&&&&&&&二、 各国立法例6-7&&&&&&&&三、 破产法的历史沿革7-9&&&&第二节 破产法的新发展：重整制度9-24&&&&&&&&一、 传统破产法的缺陷9-13&&&&&&&&二、 重整制度的兴起13-17&&&&&&&&三、 重整制度的概念、内容和特点17-24&&&&第三节 重整制度与债权人利益保护24-29&&&&&&&&一、 重整制度对债权人程序权利的限制25-26&&&&&&&&二、 对债权人的限制是债权人与债务人共同利益的需要26-28&&&&&&&&三、 充分保护债权人的实体权利是限制的前提28-29第二章 我国破产立法和相关实践29-43&&&&第一节 我国破产法律制度29-35&&&&&&&&一、 我国破产立法现状29-32&&&&&&&&二、 我国现行破产法立法的一般规定32-34&&&&&&&&三、 我国没有破产重整制度34-35&&&&第二节 我国的企业重组35-43&&&&&&&&一、 企业整顿35-38&&&&&&&&二、 自行和解38-40&&&&&&&&三、 我国企业整顿制度的缺陷40-43第三章 建立我国重整制度加强对债权人利益的保护43-65&&&&第一节 建立我国的破产重整制度的必要性43-45&&&&&&&&一、 亚洲金融危机的警示43&&&&&&&&二、 现行破产法和行政整顿制度不适应现实需要43-45&&&&第二节 对重整制度中保护债权人利益的建议45-65&&&&&&&&一、 我国建立重整制度应体现对债权人利益的保护45-46&&&&&&&&二、 重整制度中保护债权人利益的原则46-50&&&&&&&&三、 重整制度中保护债权人利益的程序规则50-65参考文献及注释65-69论文摘要69-72论文摘要（英文）72原价：￥20.00元折价：￥5.00元分享到：相关文献|}