Bet for Bug Racing
Are you ready to the most addictive BUG racing game? Stake on your favorite bug and wait the start of the race. So simple rules, yet attractive adventure is waiting for you! You should use your wisdom, through betting to get wealth, if your bug wins you'll get your 3x bet. Guess the winner and guess the best bug in this racecourse. In this game you will see 5 bugs of different colors and you have to choose one or more to stake on it. Attention, you can ran out of your coins, so keep up with your virtual money. Bet for Bug Racing game Features: - Place a bet quickly on several cars at once to increase your chance to win.- Infinite races, don't spend all your money for one race. - User-friendly interface and intuitive control.
You’ll definitely love this game. Just try this once after that you will never leave the racing tracks.
用户名：锋友
同时转发到新浪微博（授权已过期，点击续期）
同时转发到腾讯微博
评论成功！Bug 520888 & bnx2 driver crashes under random circumstances
Red Hat Bugzilla & Bug&520888
bnx2 driver crashes under random circumstances
bnx2 driver crashes under random circumstances
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification:
Component:
&&&&Multiple Devices (MD)
&&&&Device Mapper
&&&&&&&&Core
&&&&&&&&Crypt
&&&&&&&&Multipath
&&&&&&&&RAID
&&&&&&&&Snapshots
&&&&&&&&Other
&&&&Storage Drivers
File Systems
&&&&GFS/GFS2
&&&&AutoFS
Networking
&&&&Protocol
&&&&&&&&sctp
&&&&&&&&igmp/mld
&&&&&&&&tcp
&&&&&&&&udp
&&&&&&&&arp/icmp
&&&&NIC Drivers
&&&&Bonding
&&&&Bridge
&&&&Tunnel
&&&&IPSec/Crypto
&&&&Netfilter
Memory management
Power Management
Process management
&&&&Graphics
Virtualization
&&&&Hyper-V
Debugging/Tracing
&&&&Kexec/kdump
&&&&Utrace/Uprobe/Ptrace
&&&&EDAC/HERM
&&&&Oprofile
&&&&Systemtap
&&&&Locking/lockdep
Platform Enablement
Infiniband
&&&&SELinux
&&&&Key Management
John Feeney
QA Contact:
Red Hat Kernel QE team
Docs Contact:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Show dependency
15:08 EDT by Marc Mercer
andrew.masterton
rob.braden
roland.friedwagner
samuel.kielek
stephan.wiesand
Fixed In Version:
Story Points:
Environment:
Last Closed:
13:26:21 EST
Regression:
Mount Type:
Documentation:
Verified Versions:
oVirt Team:
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
AttachmentsNate Silver, whose models give Obama a high probability of winning reelection, has offered one of his critics a bet. “Putting your money where your mouth is,” is a time-honored principle of integrity in my view but the NYTimes Public Editor is . Margaret Sullivan, however, never offers an argument against betting instead treating it as unseemly.
[Betting is] inappropriate for a Times journalist, which is how Mr. Silver is seen by the public even though he’s not a regular staff member.
“I wouldn’t want to see it become newsroom practice,” said the associate managing editor for standards, Philip B. Corbett. He described Mr. Silver’s status as a blogger — something like a columnist — as a mitigating factor…
…When he came to work at The Times, Mr. Silver gained a lot more visibility and the credibility associated with a prominent institution. But he lost something, too: the right to act like a free agent with responsibilities to nobody’s standards but his own.
The closest to an argument against betting is this:
…whatever the motivation behind it, the wager offer is a bad idea – giving ammunition to the critics who want to paint Mr. Silver as a partisan who is trying to sway the outcome.
My best parse of the argument is that by betting Silver has given himself an interest in the election and this hurts his credibility. Nothing, however, could be further from the truth.
A properly structured bet is the most credible guarantor of rigorous disinterest. In order to prove his point, Silver is not required to take the Obama side of the bet! At the odds implied by his model (currently between 3 and 4 to 1) Silver should be willing to take either side of a modest bet. Indeed, we could hold a coin toss, heads Silver takes the Obama side, tails he takes Romney.
In fact, the NYTimes should require that Silver, and other pundits, . Furthermore, to remove any possibility of manipulation, the NYTimes should escrow a portion of Silver’s salary in a blind trust bet. In other words, the NYTimes should bet a portion of Silver’s salary, at the odds implied by Silver’s model, randomly choosing which side of the bet to take, only revealing to Silver the bet and its outcome after the election is over. A blind trust bet creates incentives for Silver to be disinterested in the outcome but very interested in the accuracy of the forecast.
Overall, I am for betting because I am against bullshit. Bullshit is polluting our discourse and drowning the facts. A bet costs the bullshitter more than the non-bullshitter so the willingness to bet signals honest belief. and it is a just tax, tribute paid by the bullshitters to those with genuine knowledge.
Our Web Pages
Contact Us
Blogs We Like
Interesting People and Sites
Recent Posts
Supporters
CategoriesCategories
Select Category
Books&&(2,407)
Current Affairs&&(3,262)
Data Source&&(1,548)
Economics&&(9,181)
Education&&(1,946)
Film&&(459)
Food and Drink&&(923)
Games&&(232)
History&&(1,853)
Law&&(2,007)
Medicine&&(1,153)
Music&&(439)
Philosophy&&(802)
Political Science&&(2,026)
Religion&&(413)
Science&&(1,556)
Sports&&(393)
Television&&(228)
The Arts&&(493)
Travel&&(290)
Travels&&(249)
Uncategorized&&(3,897)
Web/Tech&&(1,909)
Weblogs&&(117)
Select Month
August 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003}